ADOR Strongly Rejects Workplace Harassment Claims

Workplace harassment allegations against ADOR have been met with strong denial, as the company disputes manager A’s claims of unfair treatment. ADOR asserts that A’s actions involved unauthorized contact with advertisers, violating contractual terms, and dismisses A’s accusations as unfounded. This controversy has led to widespread skepticism, with many questioning the validity of A’s claims.

Accusations of Workplace Harassment by ADOR Against NewJeans’ Manager

Manager A, responsible for NewJeans, accused ADOR and CEO Kim Juyoung of workplace harassment. A recounted being summoned to the office on November 3 under the guise of discussing a journalist’s inquiry. However, the meeting abruptly turned into an interrogation about whether A had contacted advertisers directly.

Unlawful Confinement and Forced Laptop Surrender

Earlier that day, A filed a complaint with the Ministry of Employment and Labor against ADOR for workplace harassment. A claimed ADOR deceived them into a work meeting, issued a suspension notice, and demanded the immediate return of their laptop. Despite requesting to return it the next day, A alleged they were unlawfully confined for three hours until the laptop was surrendered.

ADOR Defends Actions and Cites Misconduct

ADOR responded by accusing Manager A of bypassing the company to facilitate direct contracts between NewJeans and advertisers. The company argued this violated the group’s exclusive contract. The company stated they gave A ample opportunities to explain, but A allegedly provided false statements. They denied any coercive acts during the laptop retrieval and announced plans for legal action.

Manager A Claims Retaliation and Denies Wrongdoing

Manager A insisted they acted under NewJeans’ instructions to relay the group’s intentions to advertisers. Since members could not contact advertisers directly, A facilitated communication on their behalf. A denied committing any misconduct, accusing ADOR of twisting the facts to frame them. They also revealed that the company’s security team used intimidation tactics, even involving A’s parents.

Public Reaction and Workplace Harassment Debate Surrounding ADOR

When this controversy surfaced on MLBPARK, many users ridiculed Manager A’s defense. They argued A’s admission of direct advertiser contact contradicted their claims of innocence. Critics insisted A’s failure to immediately return the work laptop and subsequent formatting constituted serious misconduct. The community viewed the situation as NewJeans and their manager recklessly disregarding protocol, risking severe consequences.

Min Heejin and Allegations of NewJeans’ Contract Termination

Min Heejin faces allegations of orchestrating NewJeans’ contract termination with ADOR, sparking legal and public scrutiny. Reports claim she engaged investors to facilitate the group’s exit and influenced key events like a live broadcast and National Assembly attendance.

I appreciate you taking the time to read this post. Please share your thoughts in the comments!